More Pages: New Britain Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15


Adventure in the King's Forest
The best book I have ever read...
Really good children's book.

Great tales in an unsatisfactory editionRe-issuing Roughead's work is really a feather in NYRB's cap, and yet I can't help wishing they had taken more pains with this edition. (Because of this, I felt I could not really offer it the five stars it otherwise would've deserved.) The introduction by Luc Sante is interesting, but not without errors: he notes that all of the crimes excepting those of Burke and Hare "are discoveries [on the part of Roughead]"; yet Roughead himself admits that Deacon Brodie's case has been dramatized many times, and inspired Stevenson's "Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde." Madeleine Smith's trial inspired a film, "Madeleine," directed by David Lean in the 1950s. Similarly, no editor seems to have taken the time to annotate some of Roughead's more bizarre (or anachronistic, or peculiarly Scottish) terms: "douce" is used repeatedly for "sweet", and "lands" (apparently a term for the highrise towers in Edinburgh) recurs often too, yet there's nary a word of explanation. This lack of editorial interference is not welcome, especially since Roughead often refers repeatedly to other writings of his which his original audience would have recognized but which remain obscure to a contemporary reader.
Still, this book is a real treasure--and, as with all NYRB books, it comes on beautiful paper and with a gorgeous cover.
The Holy Grail of True Crime Literature
Classic collection by the greatest true-crime writer

Very Funny, Worth While
A Really HILARIOUS and MEMORABLE read. Fasten your seatbelt!
thoroughly engrossing, monthy phython style of humor

a first-rate read
Highly recommended, inspiring reading.
One more step on the rehabilitation roadThe whole story ebbs and flows wildly with emotion, and you can only wonder at Pritchard's strength of character, and marvel at his ability to tell his story in such a clear manner.
See also (...)for further details of Pritchard's experiences.


Blown off-courseUnfortunately, while this book succeeds in giving one a better understanding of the general process surrounding British colonization of Australia, and the many hardships involved, this was not its primary goal and otherwise I found it lacking. It is not precisely, as the cover claims, "the true story" of the ship and its convict women, since none of the women left any written record at all of their experience. It is rather a mixture of the women's names and the crimes they were convicted of (gleaned from London criminal records) braided together with an assortment of facts from contemporary travellers' accounts, sailors' reminiscences, and other source material which gives the flavor of the period but does not directly relate to the story of the ship and its women. Far, far too many times, Sian Rees resorts to phrases including "it is possible that..." or "must have been" or "would have started" or "presumably" or "probably"... Rees does rely heavily on the published memoirs of John Nicol, a sailor on the Lady Julian; her reliance on Nicol makes it all the more jarring that she freely dismisses him whenever his memoirs contradict her assumptions, as when after quoting him dozens of times she dismisses his memory of a particular incident saying "this was in memoirs written when he was an old man, which are inaccurate in other details."
I really wanted to like this book, and the author is to be commended for trying to rescue the forgotten story of the female convicts. But this is light reading, not rigorous history, and where the documentary sources just aren't there she might have done better to write a historical novel and fictionalize freely rather than build a "non-fiction" book out of a tapestry of conditional statements.
Impressive research and fascinating storyBeginning with a description of the "crimes" for which women were sentenced to capital punishment and proceeding through the trials, prison conditions, and alternate punishment of banishment, Ms. Rees traces the voyage of the first group of women convicts to Australia. From the onset, she admits that her primary sources are limited and one, the diary of one of the crew of the Lady Julian, is somewhat doubtful because it was written so long after the fact. Even so, she has pulled together court records, contemporary British accounts of prison conditions, accounts of later voyages and other sources into a very impressive piece of research, and a very readable story.
In particular, her accounts of ship-board births, the pecking order among the female prisoners, the rights the crew assumed (both for sexual favors and for selling them in the ports of call) are fascinating reading.
Deserves a PulitizerThe horrific means of coping with an over-populated society included shipping women convicts to the Austrailian colonies for "crimes" ranging from hankerchief theft to manslaughter.
Disregard the title's implications. This book is a gripping account of how more than 200 women and children survived a ghastly voyage and how many emerged as heroines.
It's one of those books you don't want to end and will contemplate long after the last page is read.


Fascinating reading, a little cursoryI especially liked the earliest two volumes. While they cover the most ground in terms of years (and are therefore the least detailed), they cover the time that most people know the least about. Thus, it was almost like hearing the stories for the first time (or, at least, unfiltered through the words of Shakespeare).
There are some questionable choices of material, however. For instance, the French revolution is covered in detail. While an important event, it did not happen to English people directly - a statement of the results and the reaction in England would have sufficed. Contrast this with the very sparse (2 pages, I think) coverage of the Jacobite Rebellion of 1746 - this was a major event for the Scottish nation (at least, for the Highlands), and does not receive appropriate consideration. There are numerous other instances of questionable emphasis - virtually nothing is said of the colonisation of America until the American Revolution, and Ireland, Scotland, and Wales are only mentioned when in conflict with England. Are they not also "English Speaking People"?
These are minor flaws, however. All in all, I recommend picking it up if you see it in a used bookstore somewhere. It doesn't have the personal feel of Churchill's "Second World War" set, but it is a fascinating and enjoyable romp through the ages.
WHO LET THIS GO OUT OF PRINT?
One of the best at his best

Out Comes The DeadBell investigated (for nearly 20 years) the vampire legend which began in New England (and still exists there) starting in the late 1600s. It seemed that people believed that the consumption, a deadly desease at the time, was caused by vampires. Bell takes many scenarios and cases he has found throughout New England and investigates them, trying to explain the origin of the legend as well as its outcome.
The book lags a little when Bell tries to link the whole phenomenon with popular myth. This vampire legend differs greatly from the Dracula legend we are used to these days. These vampires are not night-walkers and blood sucking fiends, they kill from their grave! His short lesson in pop culture history is a little too long and a little too obvious for my taste.
I really enjoyed this book. It is a great lesson in history and in American folklore. This is one book that I will want to come back to again and again. This is one of the rare non-fiction book about vampires which does make sense and which does take the reader somewhere we haven't been before. It offered me something new and different, which is rare in this day and age. And for that, Bell's Food For The Dead deserve to stand on a high pedestal on top of all the other paranormal/non-fiction books out there.
Of Spirits & VampiresBell writes of evil spirits and vampires with candor, explaining why bodies were exhumed by rural folk in desperate attempts to thwart the ancient plague of tuberculosis. His style is scholarly without being pondereous. Down to earth, if you'll pardon a pun.
Stories of digging up bodies, removing and burning hearts are well documented. But what would lead ordinary folk to such drastic remedies? Tape recorder and camera in hand, Bell has traveled the back roads of Rhode Island, Connecticutt, New Hampshire and Vermont for 20 years seeking answers to that question.
In the first chapter Bell introduces his readers to Lewis Everett Peck, a descendant of Mercy Brown, whose grave was opened on March 17, 1892, in the hamlet of Exeter, Rhode Island. Peck tells in graphic detail how Mercy's body had turned over in the casket, how her heart still had blood in it and how her heart was burned and the ashes fed to her consumptive brother, Edwin.
Nowhere in Peck's story is Mercy identified as a vampire. But the gruesome details are accurate. And of such fabric are folk tales woven.
With the skill of a practiced story teller Bell soon makes his readers comfortable with his grisly subject. One trail leads to another as he connects first with Mercy, then with Nellie Vaughn, Nancy Young and the Tillinghast and Rose families. He uses newspaper files, countless interviews, family and church histories to build his case.
That bodies were exhumed and corpses mutilated is without question. But why resort to such extremes? Why give credence to ghosts and evil spirits? Bell offers one opinion with these words: "We derive comfort from giving tangible form to phenomena beyond our understanding...By personifying death and disease, we can more easily identify, objectify and perhaps forestall one and eradicate the other."
Did vampires once prey upon innocent country folk? You'll have to read Bell's book "Food for the Dead -- On the Trail of New England's Vampires."
(Carroll & Graf, 337 pp.)
Vampires? Who needs vampires?They didn't use the word "vampire" back in the day. The ritual (described in detail by Michael Bell) for the treatment of consumption involved a little bit of exhumation, perhaps some dismemberment, maybe some cannibalism, stuff like that. Today, it would be tough to imagine your entire family dying one by one, and a local elder saying, "Hey, if you dig up Betsy, the first one who died, you may be able to save the rest of your family. Here's how ..."
The most interesting aspect of this book is that it gives an indirect sampling of what folklorists actually do. All the research, detective work, footwork and interviewing seems a lot more substantial than just collecting urban legends or whatever. Buy it!


Good on textual evidence, weak on discussion/analysisThe basic organization of the book is cyclopaedic. It is not so much a survey of Anglo-Saxon healing knowledge or techniques, or a scholarly analysis thereof, as a catalog of sources that provide information on Anglo-Saxon healing knowledge. Several of these works are actually reproduced in full, in both Old English and modern English, while others merely have detailed quoted excerpts. There is little to no commentary on the contents of these works-- they are simply presented for the reader to examine.
What little analysis/discussion there is takes place in the opening chapter, which addresses questions of knowledge sources (e.g. how much Anglo-Saxon healing knowledge came from classical sources, how much from biblical/Christian sources, and how much from native folk medicine traditions). Pollington argues for the existence of a thriving pre-Christian, pre-classical Germanic folk medical tradition and seeks to describe its nature and function (which is cast largely in terms of general 'shamanic' functions and techniques). Though interesting, and certainly plausible, the fact of the matter is that there just isn't enough evidence out there to either make or refute this claim-- and it has to be taken as a plausible, but unverifiable, speculative idea. Perhaps Pollington could have added a little more weight to this claim by subjecting some of the texts he presents to analysis in way that supplies evidence for this claim (i.e. to show that some texts describe techniques that weren't part of classical/Christian medical lore-- but alas, he really doesn't give that here.
When all's said and done, this is still a worthy book on a subject about which little has been written. Given that the two other major studies of the subject-- Oswald Cockayne's "Leechdoms, Wortcunning, and Starcraft of Early England" (1864) and Henry S. Wellcome's "Anglo-Saxon Leechcraft" (1912)are long, long out of print, this contitutes the best available published source on the subject of Anglo Saxon medical knowledge-- and provides translations of important Anglo-Saxon medical texts that might otherwise be unavailable to readers without access to a good university library. The definitive work on Anglo-Saxon medicine is yet to be written-- if indeed it is writable at all-- butseems likely that Pollington's book will be the best one around for quite some time.
Ignore the Dumezilian prattle, and you've got a winner.The rest of the book is very useful. He brings together a lot of material that is extremely difficult to track down. His translations are reasonable and accurate, if not inspired. It is well organized, and he gives a lot of context from Latin and Greek sources.
Pollington isn't New Age. This isn't some Llewellyn "how to be an authentic Anglo-Saxon witch" fantasy. This is serious scholarship. However, it is readable enough to be of use to most Anglo-Saxon reconstructionists, with enough meat to satisfy a true scholar.
An interesting history

Good, but huge
Basic to all serious study on the topic
A must have for any collection.Arranged alphabetically, the Encyclopedia remains the most invaluable reference resource for the Arthurian Legend. Each entry is written and signed by a scholar of Arthurian studies, and is followed, where necessary, by a short bibliography. The index is much easier to use than the one in the original volume. A must have for any collection.


The exploits of a WWII RAF pilot brought to life
Very good
One of the most exciting accounts of the Battle of Britain.